Cliques

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Cliques. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Cliques paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Cliques, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Cliques paper at affordable prices!

Social classes are everywhere in society. Upper class, middle class, and lower class have been around for a long time and probably always will be. If everyone belongs to a certain group does this mean we just fall into them or how do they form. Must people will tell you they don¡¯t like social classes and will probably tell you that they don¡¯t belong to one. Chances are they are lying to you and they do belong to one. Unless you are a loner, everyone belongs to some kind of clique, no matter what type it might be.

These social classes are a very big part of High School. There are a variety of social cliques like the jocks, the cheerleaders, the preppies, the nerds, the skateboarders, and etc. I think no matter where you go or what high school you are in all of them will have some type of social classification system. These social classes or cliques are judged and criticized for who they are and what they stand for. Being a new student walking down a hallway in an unfamiliar place with unfamiliar faces can be hard to deal with. Trying to make new friends and trying so hard to fit in somewhere. With schools having these social cliques it can be hard for the new student to find where they fit in. For example, a student wearing high-water pants, suspenders, glasses, and carrying a lot of books would not fit in with the jocks. If the student had any kind of interaction with the jocks it would probably consist of the jocks picking on him and giving him a swirly.

A clique can be good in some ways and bad in some ways also. I think they can be good when you share common interests and have similar characteristics as one another. I know in my ¡°clique¡± we all have common interests. We all like to go to sporting events, watch movies, play games, and just hangout together. We also share common characteristics; we are all outgoing, humorous, honest, trustworthy and easy-going. All of us just ¡°fit¡± together. We are always there for one another and are always willing to listen to one another when any of us have a problem or just need someone to talk to. I don¡¯t know what you would call us, most people would call us the preppies and say we are stuck up. In my opinion, I don¡¯t think our school is that bad when it comes to social cliques because our senior class all runs together, our group consists of a little of each class. If a new student came we would not prejudge them and would try to welcome them the best we could. Our group is our senior class so we¡¯ve all grown up together and just conformed to one another.

Custom writing service can write essays on Cliques

Some students don¡¯t even realize they are in a clique. Most students take part in cliques to always have someone there and to do stuff with. Some join groups and depend on them because their home life isn¡¯t the best. These people don¡¯t get support at home and so they can get it from their group of friends, said Nancy Wride in her article ¡°A Vicious Circle.¡± She also thinks that student friendships are becoming as important as family relationships.

Cliques can also be negative. When a certain group picks on another one or judges them for who they are it can be very bad. For example, school shootings can be a result of cliques. The shooters in these cases have never fit in and have been judged by other groups, this could push them to the edge to do something as severe as shooting their fellow students. When two people within a certain group get in a fight, the other members will take sides and that might not be fair to one of the fighters. The people in these cliques should be your ¡°true¡± friends when you feel they are against you, you can become depressed and lonely. Another negative thing would be if the group was a violent clique. They could destruct things or property or they could bully other students just for their own pleasure. Around our area I haven¡¯t heard of that many negative cliques. The worst thing I¡¯ve known of is a certain clique making fun of another clique.

There have always been cliques or social classes and will continue to be in the years to come because you can¡¯t change society. It¡¯s sad that some people spend their whole lives trying to fit in and have people like them. The value of people and true friendships should come from our hearts.

Social classes are everywhere in society. Upper class, middle class, and lower class have been around for a long time and probably always will be. If everyone belongs to a certain group does this mean we just fall into them or how do they form. Must people will tell you they don¡¯t like social classes and will probably tell you that they don¡¯t belong to one. Chances are they are lying to you and they do belong to one. Unless you are a loner, everyone belongs to some kind of clique, no matter what type it might be.

These social classes are a very big part of High School. There are a variety of social cliques like the jocks, the cheerleaders, the preppies, the nerds, the skateboarders, and etc. I think no matter where you go or what high school you are in all of them will have some type of social classification system. These social classes or cliques are judged and criticized for who they are and what they stand for. Being a new student walking down a hallway in an unfamiliar place with unfamiliar faces can be hard to deal with. Trying to make new friends and trying so hard to fit in somewhere. With schools having these social cliques it can be hard for the new student to find where they fit in. For example, a student wearing high-water pants, suspenders, glasses, and carrying a lot of books would not fit in with the jocks. If the student had any kind of interaction with the jocks it would probably consist of the jocks picking on him and giving him a swirly.

A clique can be good in some ways and bad in some ways also. I think they can be good when you share common interests and have similar characteristics as one another. I know in my ¡°clique¡± we all have common interests. We all like to go to sporting events, watch movies, play games, and just hangout together. We also share common characteristics; we are all outgoing, humorous, honest, trustworthy and easy-going. All of us just ¡°fit¡± together. We are always there for one another and are always willing to listen to one another when any of us have a problem or just need someone to talk to. I don¡¯t know what you would call us, most people would call us the preppies and say we are stuck up. In my opinion, I don¡¯t think our school is that bad when it comes to social cliques because our senior class all runs together, our group consists of a little of each class. If a new student came we would not prejudge them and would try to welcome them the best we could. Our group is our senior class so we¡¯ve all grown up together and just conformed to one another.

Some students don¡¯t even realize they are in a clique. Most students take part in cliques to always have someone there and to do stuff with. Some join groups and depend on them because their home life isn¡¯t the best. These people don¡¯t get support at home and so they can get it from their group of friends, said Nancy Wride in her article ¡°A Vicious Circle.¡± She also thinks that student friendships are becoming as important as family relationships.

Cliques can also be negative. When a certain group picks on another one or judges them for who they are it can be very bad. For example, school shootings can be a result of cliques. The shooters in these cases have never fit in and have been judged by other groups, this could push them to the edge to do something as severe as shooting their fellow students. When two people within a certain group get in a fight, the other members will take sides and that might not be fair to one of the fighters. The people in these cliques should be your ¡°true¡± friends when you feel they are against you, you can become depressed and lonely. Another negative thing would be if the group was a violent clique. They could destruct things or property or they could bully other students just for their own pleasure. Around our area I haven¡¯t heard of that many negative cliques. The worst thing I¡¯ve known of is a certain clique making fun of another clique.

There have always been cliques or social classes and will continue to be in the years to come because you can¡¯t change society. It¡¯s sad that some people spend their whole lives trying to fit in and have people like them. The value of people and true friendships should come from our hearts.

Please note that this sample paper on Cliques is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Cliques, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Cliques will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Pain that fuels the fire

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Pain that fuels the fire. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Pain that fuels the fire paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Pain that fuels the fire, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Pain that fuels the fire paper at affordable prices!

The Pain that Fuels the Fire

Sometimes there is only a very slight thread morality, reason, or conscience keeping us from unleashing the dark desires within the depths of our thoughts. The wall which keeps such desires at bay can be very weak at times. Often, it only takes a small spark to burn the deepest inhibitions away. To Hamlet, there is a strong sense of inhibition when he first begins to suspect that his uncle, Claudius, may be responsible for his own father's death. As an educated youth in a time of general lawlessness, he has a sense of morality admirable even in modern times. Yet he has a hostility bordering on hate towards his mother for what he considers a grave injustice against his father. This is even before he suspects foul play at work in the royal court. Hamlet's hateful attitude towards women in general acts as fuel for the fire that eventually burns away his early hesitance against taking serious action towards his uncle. Characteristics he sees as weak and corrupting in women feeds his rage and sense of injustice. They are simply a disease-like influence to him. A little ghostly nudge in the general direction also keeps things moving. Finally, as Hamlet starts feeling the weight of what he considers his responsibility of retribution against his uncle, the prospect of killing what he considers a traitor to the crown and former king slowly becomes all consuming. This is all born from his feelings of misogyny, begun in his eyes by his mother.

In the early parts of the play, Hamlet is especially concerned with proving beyond all doubt that Claudius is guilty of murder. Considering the dark nature of the play and story itself, this can be considered rather commendable. He isn't about to run off and kill the new, if not suspect, king of Denmark. However, his inhibitions begin to burn, as he blames his mother for much of the predicament of the kingdom. A lustful woman, at least in her son's eyes, she married her husband's brother not two months after his death. For this, Hamlet has condemned the queen. From the day he found out that his mother and uncle would marry, she was the enemy. In the early part of the second scene of the first act, she questions the seriousness of Hamlet's grief towards his fathers passing, to which he replies angrily, "Seems, madam! Nay, it is; I know not 'seems'."(Act I, sc ii, 7) His resentment for what has happened feeds his other emotions. His feeling of helplessness, anger at events out of his control, everything has happened so fast, Hamlet has barely had time to catch up to his own emotions. He wants to reject all that is going on around him.

The Prince's grief for his father and his growing animosity towards the new crown seem to spur each other on churn together into one hate-seeped dangerous emotion. His love for the former king makes him hate Claudius and his mother, Gertrude, all the more, while his hate for the crown makes him idolize his father just that much more. After being "comforted" by his mother and new king, Hamlet speaks one of the most important soliloquies in the play. In it, he expresses his anger at the recent events, and vocally condemns Gertrude "Must I remember? Why, she would hang on him, as if increase of appetite had grown by what it fed on; and yet within a month, let me not think on't Frailty, thy name is woman! A little month; or ere those shoes were old with which she follow'd my poor father's body; like Niobe, all tears; why she, even she- O God! a beast, that wants discourse of reason, would have mourned longer," (Act I, sc ii, 147-155) Then he ends with the final accusation "Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears had left the flushing in her galled eyes, she married. O! most wicked speed, to post with such dexterity to incestuous sheets." (Act I, sc ii, 15-16) This is a fine example of his animosity to his remaining parent. He thinks she just jumped into Claudius' bed upon the death of her husband. There is also the possibility that Hamlet thinks Gertrude was having "incestuous" relations with his uncle before the death of his father.

Custom writing service can write essays on The Pain that fuels the fire

There is also a factor in Hamlets semi-misogyny which cements his attitude first towards his mother, and through her, all the women he comes in contact with. His father's ghost. This apparition plays an important part in Hamlet's justification of his actions from their conversation on. The spirit actually says of his former wife "From me, whose love was that of dignity that it went hand in hand even with the vow I made to her in marriage, and to decline upon a wretch whose natural gifts were poor to those of mine." (Act I, sc v, 55-5) The anger towards Gertrude's actions goes beyond a single generation.

Hamlet just so happens to have a little love interest at the opening of the play, the willowy Ophelia. However, due to her oddly overprotective father, she is forbidden to see Hamlet. Yet when he apparently goes mad, she is used as bait in order to discern what is going on with the prince. She is somewhat translucent when compared to the depth of Hamlet's character. She is also easily lead, best exemplified by her obedience to her father and king. One could also make a point that she is merely weakened by her position in society at the time, i.e. daughter and woman, but she best described as a victim. She is caught between Hamlet's conflicting emotions about what is going on around him and his hostile attitude towards his mother. In Act three, scene one, while Polonius and company are listening to Hamlet's conversation with Ophelia, Hamlet denies ever loving her "No, not I. I never gave you aught."(Act , sc I, 105) He could just as well be saying this to those secretly listening, but a second later when he says, "Get thee to a nunnery. Why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners? I am myself indifferent honest, but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, believe none of us. Go thy ways to a nunnery." (Act , sc i, 11-140) you can taste the venom in his words. Ophelia's rejection of him and her weak willed submission to the bidding of others only strengthens his resolve against what he sees as a lustful, corruptive, and ultimately flawed gender. His somewhat inappropriate innuendos towards Ophelia earlier in their conversation represent his disgust with her, or more specifically, all women at this point. To close the conversation he vocalizes his disgust "Or if thou needs marry, marry a fool, for wise men know well enough what monsters you make of them." (Act , sc I, 14-151) and also, "God hath given you one face, and you make yourselves another. You jig and amble, and you lisp; you nickname God's creatures and make your wantonness your ignorance." (Act , sc i, 155-158) Right there Hamlet says that women make excuses for their immorality. Unfortunately this is mostly directed towards his mother, but Ophelia bears the brunt of his anger. From this point on, Hamlet is more resolute in his actions, more set on his path, his first victim being Ophelia's own father.

Much of the tragedy of Hamlet is taken up by his hesitance to do anything rash, while the most important parts of the play are rash actions in themselves. His inhibitions against taking action towards his uncle eventually fall against the emotions he feels after speaking with his father's ghost and the anger over his mother's seemingly sexual attraction to positions of power, especially social ones. It is his feelings about Gertrude that leak over into his feelings about Claudius, and in condemning his mother he more importantly condemns he who killed the king of Denmark. This powerful action has its seed sown in Hamlet's misogyny. His feelings towards his mother are not much more than the grief for his father finding an outlet in an incestuous parent, at least in the beginning. Then as Hamlet suspects Claudius, those feelings spread to women in general, whom he sees as the enemy, against who he carries the torch of mixed revenge and supposed justice. Unfortunately, it will only be quenched with the blood of many. Too many.

Please note that this sample paper on The Pain that fuels the fire is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Pain that fuels the fire, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Pain that fuels the fire will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Begining Philosophy

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Begining Philosophy. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Begining Philosophy paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Begining Philosophy, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Begining Philosophy paper at affordable prices custom writing service!

Beginning of Philosophy

The word philosophy comes from the two Greek words philein, which means "to love" and sophia, which means "knowledge" or "wisdom".

Thales One of the first known Greek philosophers, was doing speculative physics when he claimed that everything in the natural world was made of water.

Leucuppus and Democritus Arrived at the conclusion that all matter was made from tiny particles (atoms) that were similar except for their size and shape; differences in larger bodies were accounted for by means of their different arrangements.

Buy custom Begining Philosophy term paper

Early thinkers thought of physics as a part of philosophy, and this view persisted over 000 years. The full title of Isaac Newton's Principles, in which Newton set forth his famous theories of mechanics, mathematics, and stronomy, is Mathematical principles of Natural Philosophy.

Philosophy The definition of philosophy as the love or pursuit of wisdom, but this is too vague and general. What philosophy is it self a philosophical issue, and the issue has not yet been settled. Philosophy is not an empirical science. Facts are often relevant to a philosophical question, but they cannot by themselves provide us with an answer.

Many philosophical questions concern to norms.

Normative questions ask about the value of something. These sciences are interested in finding out what things are, but they cannot tell us how things ought to be.

Ethical or aesthetic norms are standards of one kind or another and we apply them when we decide for example what is right or wrong, good or bad…

When we voluntarily choose to do something, nothing makes us choose. Given the state of the world at the time you chose to extend a helping hand, you might have chosen not to do so. If this is tru- if nothing made you choose- then it follows that the choice cannot have been caused. If it had been caused, then given the state of the world at the time the cause happened, you could not have chosen not to make the choice. The problem is voluntary choices happen. They seem to be real things. So the theory that voluntary choices are not caused runs counter to another belief we have, that everything that happens was caused. Worse still, if your choice was not caused to happen, then you did not cause it to happen. That conflicts with yet another belief we have- namely, that for a choice like this we deserve praise. If you did not cause it to happen, what sense is there in praising you?

David Hume argued that really mean that cause C had effect E is that C made E happen. But Hume's view seemed paradoxical at the time he stated it, and many who read Hume are still far from conviced he was right.

The Divisions of Philosophy

Metaphysics Which studies the nature of being. What is being? What are its fundamental features and properties? These are two basic questions of metaphysics.

Epistemology The theory of knowledge. What is the nature of knowledge and what are its criteria, sources, and limits?

Ethics or moral philosophy The philosophical study of moral judgments, which includes, most importantly, the question Which moral judgments are correct?

Social Philosophy The philosophical study of society and its institutions. This branch of philosophy is concerned especially with determining the features of the ideal or best society.

Political philosophy Focuses on one social institution, the state, and seeks to determine its justification and ethically proper organization. Political philosophy is so closely related to social philosophy that it is common to treat them as a single area, social-political philosophy.

Aesthetics The philosophical study of art and of value judgments about art, and of beauty in general.

Logic The theory of correct reasoning, which seeks to investigate and establish the criteria of valid inference and demonstration.

So philosophy has seven major branches. However, the various main branches of philosophy do not each contain and equal number of theories or concepts or words.

Philosophy view Historically

Ancient philosophy Sixth century B.C through, approx, the third acentury A.D.

Medieval philosophy Third through sixteenth centuries, approx.

Modern philosophy Fifteenth through twentieth centuries.

Contemporary philosophy Twentieth century.

Philosophy can also be divided geographically, Eastern philosophy an d Western philosophy being the main divisions, with further subdivisions…

In the twentieth century the predominant interests and methods of philosophers in the West have tended to separate philosophy into two fairly distinct traditions

Analytic philosophy Analytic philosophers believe (or are the intellectual descendants of those who did believe) that the proper method of philosophy is what is called analysis. Generally (but with exceptions) this is the predominant tradition in English speaking countries.

Continental philosophy Several approaches to philosophy fit under this heading, including principally what are known as existentialism, phenomenology, hermeneutics. Generally but with important exceptions this is the predominant in Continental Europe.

Arguments

When someone supports a belief by giving a reason for accepting the belief, he or she has given an argument. Setting forth arguments is the most basic of philosophical activities and is one of the activities that distinguishes philosophy from merely having opinions.

The conclusion of a person's argument is the point he or she is trying to stablish; the reason the person gives for accepting the conclusion is stated in the premises of the argument.

There are just two ways in which an argument can fail or be incorrect. On one hand, one or more of the premises might be questionable. On the other hand, even if none of the premises are questionable, they might fail to stablish the conclusion. Logic, the theory of correct inherence, is concerned with the second type of failure.

Fallacies are common mistakes in reasoning of the second type, and one important contribution of logi has been identification, classification, and analysis of fallacies. Obviously, everyone concerned with sound reasoning, inclusding philosophers, tries to avoid fallacies, but even philosophers are not always successful in doing so. Some fallacies are frequently encountered in philosophical discussions.

Argumentum ad hominem (Argument to the person). Frequently people have the mistaken idea that they can successfully challenge a view by criticizing the person who holds that view. Ad hominem arguments are surprinsingly common, and it can take a special effort to remember to evaluate a person's views on their merits and not on the merits of the person whose views they are.

Appeals to emotion Arguments that try to stablish conclusions solely by attempting to arouse or play on the emotions of a listener or reader.

Straw man Sometimes people (even philosophers) will "refute" someone's view by refuting what is actually a mispresentation of that view. If we aren't carefull we may think the original view has been refuted rather than the "straw man" that actually has been attacked. When the Irish philosopher George Berkeley maintained that physical objects are really just clusters of sensations existing only in the mind, the English writer Samuel Johnson "refuted" Berkely by noting that some physical objects are so hard that things just bounce off them. Johnson then kicked a rock, trying to demonstrate that rocks are too hard to be mere sensations. But Johnson had in fact misrepresented Berkeley, for Berkeley had never maintained that rocks are not hard. Johnson had set up a straw man that was easy to knock over.

Red herring To address a point other than the one actually at issue; that is, to bring in something that is off the point. You chose to act is not equivalent to the fact that you could have acted differently.

Ad hominem arguments, appeals to emotion, and straw man arguments might all be said to be read herrings because they all seek to establish something that is not quite the issue.

Begging the question One premise rests on an assumption that is more or less identical to the very thing you are trying to prove as your conclusion. The argument begs on the question.

Black-or-white fallacy Arguments that limit us to two options when in fact more options exist commit the black-or-white fallacy.

Please note that this sample paper on Begining Philosophy is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Begining Philosophy, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Begining Philosophy will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans? paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans? paper at affordable prices with !

Socialism How can it benefit the African Americans?

Could one ever imagine a world where a small percentage of people do not dominate in the cooperate world but every individual, even an African American, is practically equal? Could one imagine a world where Bill Gates' worth is as much as the poorest African American individual? Could one ever imagine a world where African Americans would benefit and be instrumental as much as other races in the economy? There would be no dominate individual or race, but the nation will be stronger and the economy would be stronger financially. This may only seem as a dream at first, but such a world is possible and closer than one may think. A world where no one person has more power than the next and money has virtually no value may seem as a ludicrous idea to some, but it is a great idea to others. This great idea is called Socialism.

Socialism is defined as the ownership of exploitable capital and means of production by the government, not by individuals or by private enterprise. This means that no one person could benefit personally within the economy. Common ownership will do away with the need for exchange, so that money will have no use. In the African American community, money is a major issue. Young African Americans often sale drugs for the need of money and other African Americans kill one another for the want of money. If the idea of socialism came into an existence, money would no longer be an issue and drugs and murder for money will decrease in the African American community.

People on the basis of social need, not profit, will determine the production of products in a socialist economy. At the moment people may need wealth but, unless they can afford to buy it, they must go without it. If money was no longer an issue in the economy, the poorer families could benefit more and could be provided with a lot more than what they are able to have now. African Americans who are poor are poor because of the lack of jobs, the minimum wage work and unequal opportunities. With socialism, the means of producing and distributing wealth - factories, farms, mines, docks, offices, transport - will belong to the whole community. This means that African Americans could benefit because everyone is equal and works for the needs of the community.

Work in a socialist society will depend on cooperation and the voluntary decisions of men and women to contribute to society in order to keep it going. This means that if the community as a whole does not work to keep the socialism alive within their community, everyone will suffer. Just as an individual could not survive if he or she did not eat, drink or take basic health care, so a socialist society would not survive unless the people in it acted cooperatively in a spirit of mutuality. This will encourage African Americans to work and be able to provide for themselves and their families. It will also encourage them to be cooperative within the community and work for a common goal. Today, many African Americans try to compete with each other, not realizing that this is harmful in the long run. Competitiveness causes jealously, greed and often leads to harm to those involved. With socialism, competition will not be an issue because everyone will be on an equal plane.

Currently, African Americans have a high rate of infant mortality. Every year, fifteen million children under five die of starvation. Many times in these cases, a family could not provide the proper necessities to support a healthy environment for their children. With socialism, a society based on production for use, would not tolerate such obscenity. Those families with infants and children too young to work will want to provide for their children and infants and therefore, will be motivated to do so. In some cases with child starvation, people are too lazy to provide for their families and rely on the aid of others. But, within a socialist community where everyone is offered an equal opportunity, those people will feel more instrumental in the economy and will be more willing to work and in turn, will be able to provide for their families.

Critics of the socialist proposition often tell us that socialism would be confronted with millions of men and women who would refuse to do their bit to make society run efficiently and, for some time, African Americans have carried the stereotype of being lazy. Unfortunately, in a socialist society, unpleasant work will still have to be done. Of course, much of the dirty work of the profit system, such as killing and conning and counting bank notes, will be dispensed with immediately in a socialist society. Other unappealing work can probably be taken care of by labor saving machines. Dirty work such as work in factories, farms, mines and docks, would have to be done, but in an organized fashion. The community, as a whole, would have to come to a consensus to provide a schedule of work so that the work would not have to be done by the same people all the time. This way, everyone would equally be able to contribute to the community and would not feel that they work unfairly within the community.

Critics who oppose socialism fear that human greed will lead people to consume all the wealth of society within one month. A problem within the African American community is the unemployment rate. If individuals did consume all the products within one month, the community would have to work to provide for their families. The unemployment rate will increase as a result of supply and demand. African Americans would become more instrumental in the economy than ever before. This is one way that African Americans could finally come together and make a difference within America. This, in turn, will encourage cooperation and inspire togetherness within the African American community.

Critics are also worried that in a society of free access, people will take more than they need. It is quite true that if the stores were opened tomorrow and workers were invited to go in and take as much as they want without having to pay, there would be a mad rush and the stores would be empty within a day. But why should this be the case if the stores are always open for free access? With socialism, African Americans would appreciate the necessities more and would adapt to using products sparingly and not over indulge in the luxury of such products. They will become more resourceful and responsible. Socialism will heighten and expand the morals instilled in African Americans.

Socialism is not difficult to understandit simply means directly producing what is needed, without the need for monetary exchange, as in capitalism. Throughout human history there has always been production solely for use, starting with food gathering and tool making in hunter-gatherer societies. Socialism will bring about and create a new form of unity within the nation and amongst the African American communities nationwide. This is one of the things that is lacking within the African American community. With socialism, everyone will have to work together to provide for his or her family. They will also be more motivated to work with each other because they are striving for the same, simple goal survival. To be unified for a cause is one thing that is dreamed and yearned for within the African American community; socialism has the potential to bring such unity about. Socialism will probably never exist anytime soon, if ever, but it should be understood that it could be have a very positive influence and change on the nation. African Americans are in a need for a more effective, positive change and socialism could definitely bring this about. It will encourage African Americans to work harder and in turn, will be able to provide more for their families. With socialism, African Americans will become more powerful and highly respected than ever before. Socialism should be supported more within the nation because with the support of socialism, there is the support of a united nation.

Please note that this sample paper on Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Socialism: How can it benefit the African Americans? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart paper at affordable prices!

A Visionary Heart

.

In the story, The Little Prince, the author, Antoinne De Saint-Exupery, is the narrator who is ostensibly recounting what occurred when his plane put down in the Sahara Desert, six years earlier, due to engine trouble. The story is written in simple, short sentences, as would be suitable to use to tell a tale to a small child, making it sound deceptively similar to a Peter-Pan-like a fairy tale. Briefly, a young prince from a distant planet comes upon the stranded author, and tells him of his experiences, in the form of parables, as he wandered among the planets seeking wisdom. One of the characters encountered by the Little Prince, the fox, reveals a "secret" to the prince, "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." After a week, which turns out to be the Little Prince's last week on the earth having arrived exactly one year earlier on that spot, the little prince is bitten by a snake and "appears" to die, although his body disappears, in order to return to his planet. The author, with his repaired plane, is left sad but enlightened and relates the story, complete with child-like drawings which are accompanied by explanations that encourage the reader to see the meaning in the drawings, more than the literal sketches. By illustration and by words, Saint-Exupery draws the reader into his vision and subtly exhorts the reader to lift his focus from that of an adult, critical reader into the realm of fantasy and enlightenment.

One of the first stories, told in chapters related by the narrator, is a story about an occurrence before he, the narrator, landed in the desert and encounters the Little Prince. The narrator, while ostensibly pointing out the limitations of his artistry, encourages the reader to see more than is on the page, that is Saint Exupery exhorts the reader to see the sketches less literally, to "see" the meaning in the drawings. In order to achieved this, Saint-Exupery describes the callous, concrete minded adults who have been unable to understand that what appeared to them to be a drawing of a hat was actually a boa constrictor which had eaten an elephant. This drawing becomes a litmus test. The Little Prince, of course, can immediately see the elephant within the boa constrictor, which signals to the reader that the Little Prince and the Narrator are of the same understanding of the significance of things, and that the Little Prince is definitely not one of the literal-minded "grown-ups." Throughout the story, the narrator reminds the reader that his drawings, particularly that of the boa constrictor, have always been misperceived by "grown-ups," and includes many other examples of adult literal-mindedness, such as preoccupation with numbers. Ultimately, if the reader would prefer to not be classed with one of the philistine "grown-ups," he or she needs to be able to "see" what the author describes as being contained, but not seen by the eye, in his sketches.

Custom writing service can write essays on The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart

The Little Prince asks the narrator to draw a sheep for him and is rather specific about how the drawing should be not too big, not too old. Finally the Prince is surprisingly very pleased with the narrator's irritable production of a picture of a box with three holes, within which is the sheep. The Prince is delighted with the narrator's artistic production, seems to treasure the drawing and there is something of an implied therapeutic value as the narrator's relationship with the Prince goes on, since he seems to elaborate less about how bad his drawings are. In fact towards the end when the narrator is producing a drawing of a muzzle for the sheep for the Prince, the Prince reassures the narrator concerning his drawings that, "Oh that will be all right, the children will understand." It is implied that the children, not the adults are ultimately the more knowledgeable. Also as his relationship with the Little Prince grows, the life on the Prince's planet, the possible use of the sheep in eating the baobabs (which need to be cut back regularly to protect the planet) and the safety of the rose grow as matters of interest and concern to the narrator. In short, the narrator comes to share his friends concerns as if they were his own.

Another parable related by narrator about the Little Prince's planetary encounters involves a fox. The fox asks the Little Prince to "tame" him and goes on to describe in a very sagacious way, that taming means " to establish ties." The fox tells the Little Prince, ". . . if you tame me, then we shall need each other. To me, you will be unique in all the world. To you, I shall be unique in all the world." The fox outlines how "taming" is done by ritualistically spending time together, coming to be reminded of the other person by seemingly unrelated visual fragments, and developing expectations of being together, wordlessly ". . . words are the sources of misunderstanding." Finally, just before the Little Prince goes off the explain the rose bushes once he realizes that his one rose is more important to him because they have "tamed" each other, the fox offers the Little Prince a present of a secret. The secret is that, ". . . It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye," and that ". . you become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed."

Throughout the story, the Prince worries about his love object, a rose who has been left behind on his planet. The Prince has one rose on his planet and is in love with it. He describes his efforts to provide it protection from cold and predators, putting his rose under a glass bell jar for protection from drafts at night. Although the rose may have been responsible for the Prince's journey, throughout the book, while the Prince is telling of his travels and traveling with the narrator, the Prince worries about the welfare of his rose, his relationship to her, and the rose come to symbolize an abandoned, and longed-for love. "She cast her fragrance and her radiance over me. I ought never to have run away from her. . . I ought to have guessed all the affection that lay behind her poor little stratagems. Flowers are so inconsistent! I was too young to know how to love her." By the end, after the snake bites the Little Prince and he appears to "die" or is back to his planet unencumbered with his body, the narrator picks up the pieces of his friend's concerns and worries about whether or not the muzzle which he has drawn has a strap to secure it onto the sheep which presumably traveled with the Little Prince. It is significant of the growth of their friendship, that the narrator has also comes to worry about the rose ". . . and for me, nothing in the universe can be the same if somewhere, we do not know where, a sheep that we never saw has yes or not?-- eaten a rose. . . And no grown-up will ever understand that this is a matter of so much importance."

Towards the end of the book, "The Little Prince," Saint-Exupery has one of the characters encountered by the little prince, the fox, reveal a "secret" to the prince, "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." In order to understand the narrator's investment in the Little Prince's concern for his rose, the reader must suspend grown-up thinking. Indeed, throughout the entire book, in order to appreciate Saint-Exupery's fantasy, the reader is required to suspend critical, literal, left-brain, judgment about the implausibility of various occurrences in order to appreciate or "see" the impressive wisdom about life, love, friendship, responsibility, understanding, knowing the truth and death which is woven into the deceptively simple story.

THE THING THAT IS IMPORTANT

IS

THE THING THAT IS NOT SEEN

SHUT YOUR EYES AND SEE THE TRUTH;

YOU'LL GET THERE FASTER

BIBLIOGAPHY

Saint Exupery, Antoinne De. (14) The Little Prince. New York,

Harcourt, Brace & Company

Please note that this sample paper on The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Little Prince, Saint Exupery's Visionary Heart will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts? paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts? paper at affordable prices!

Bowling for Columbine

A documentary by Michael Moore

HST 06 Extra Credit Option

Buy cheap Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts? term paper

Kristen Chase

A15858

Are we a nation of gun nuts or are we just nuts?

Violence, easy access to guns, rebellious adolescents, nuclear weapons, racism, fear, warped freedom, and everything that is considered wrong with America today is critically analyzed in the documentary, Bowling for Columbine, created by Michael Moore. This documentary was created following the September 11th tragedy, when two terrorist hijacked planes crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City. Moore traveled all over the United States, interviewing typical civilians, and those in the public eye about their thoughts and answers to problems dealing with gun related violence in America. Moore starts out his documentary in the state of Michigan, then visits Colorado, Utah, California, and those in their paths. The documentary included a lot of interesting clips of critical events in U.S. history involving any type of gun involvement, including the popular reality television show, "Cops", and cartoon "Southpark". Michael Moore does an excellent job of finding a variety of people to display all areas of the spectrum on feelings towards gun control, and doesn't let anything get in his way. No place is too far, and no person is too unreachable, no question is too inappropriate.

Michael Moore is from Flint, Michigan. It was surprising to hear him call Michigan "gun country". Before viewing this documentary I had no idea that the amount of guns carried in Michigan was so large. I always knew that hunting was a popular sport but I didn't realize how easy it was for anyone to purchase a gun, in fact the first subject Moore hit was a bank that when one signed up for a checking account they received a free gun. To demonstrate how easy it is to get a gun, Moore went in the bank, and only an hour later came out with a new gun. The state of Michigan was made famous for its popular Michigan Militia, and its connections with Timothy McVeigh and the Nichols brothers, James and Terry, responsible for the Oklahoma city bombings. McVeigh was executed and Nichols is serving time in prison. James Nichols, who unlike his brother, was not proven to be related to the Oklahoma City bombings, and was interviewed by Moore on his Michigan farm about his feelings on gun ownership. James sleeps with a fully loaded rifle under his pillow every night because he feels that he is expressing the freedom of his second amendment right to bare arms. He also admits that he like his brother, has created bombs and has the materials to do so on his farm. He ironically later comments that there should be some restrictions on who can get guns because "there are crazy people out there". Crazy people such as himself, I believe!

Moore then travels to the town of Littleton, Colorado where the school shooting at Columbine High School occurred. Included were several disturbing clips of 11 calls from inside the school, and security camera footage from inside the school showing the murders of innocent teenagers. Several people were interviewed, including two girls who were in the two shooters bowling class that morning, hence the movie title Bowling for Columbine.

After the brutal shootings at Columbine high school, analysts frantically tried to explain what lead to the actions the two young men, Harris and Klebold, took that horrible day in Colorado. Many suggested the breakdown of the nuclear family, video games, violent films and television shows, and most of all, music. Marilyn Manson is possibly the most attacked musician in America, accused of having a negative influence on the nation's youth. Moore interviewed Manson when he came to Littleton to give a concert and was heavily protested. Manson defended himself saying that the boys just needed someone to listen to them and that music was not the reason for the murders. He made an excellent point that on that very day that the Columbine shootings occurred, our president was launching the greatest missile attack overseas in history, yet no one was saying that the president, who has greater influence on the country than Marilyn Manson, a rock musician, was influencing violence in America. Also, Moore took note on the fact that officials were quick to say that music and media were reasons for youth violence, but couldn't something such as bowling, which the two boys did the morning of the massacre have merit to be just responsible for their actions also? This questions the basis of the reasoning for blaming things such as rock music.

Soon after the Columbine shootings the National Rifle Association held a scheduled rally in Littleton. Citizens were outraged that the NRA, an enormous promoter of the weapon that had slain so many innocent youths, was celebrating its presence in American life so soon and so close to Columbine. There were protests and the mayor of Littleton even sent Charlton Hesston, the well known president of the NRA and famous actor, a letter asking for the rally to be cancelled due to the terrible change in events in Colorado. Charlton still persisted and held the rally, saying that he had the right by the constitution to do as he pleased.

In Flint, Michigan the youngest school shooting in history, a six year old boy shooting a six year old girl in first grade, sadly occurred. To further aggravate anti-gun activists more, the NRA came to Flint shortly after the grade school shooting and held another rally. Michael Moore, who himself is from Michigan and a member of the NRA, scheduled an appointment to speak to Charlton Hesston in his mansion. He asked Hesston why he thought that the amount of deaths due to gun related violence was so dramatically higher in the United States than in any other country and Hesston could give no answer. He also could not explain why even though his life was in no danger he had a room full of fully loaded firearms. Moore then proceeded to question how he could come to Flint and Littleton so shortly after their communities were rocked by the loss of innocent youths due to shootings. Hesston got upset and walked away from Moore, completely ignoring his comments and questions. These were questions that a lot of the population needed to know not only of Charlton Hesston, but the other thousands who have firearms for no reason and have no answers to the escalated gun problem in America.

The documentary never actually seemed to find a solution to the problem. Why are there so many more firearm related deaths in America than any other place on this Earth? America has had no more bloody of a history than other leading countries who have a much lower number of gun fatalities per year. Moore suggested things such as easy access to firearms and ammunition and the long standing issue of racism. Americans are living in a state of constant fear he noted. While in one year the murder rate dropped by 0% the news coverage of violence increased by 600%. Americans are untrusting of their neighbors and many feel they need firearms for protection. Every time you turn on the news there is coverage of rape, robbery, murder, and riots. There is no escaping this worry over protecting oneself and their family.

In conclusion, allowing more guns to be accessed in the United States is not making the nation a safer place to live. If having more guns meant more safety, than the nation would not lose so many to gun violence daily. The right to bare arms is guaranteed the constitution but so it the right to life and protection. In this day these to freedoms we have as Americans seem to be contradicting one another. As history and each day in America continues to prove, gun control is not strong enough. Until people can be free of fear of gun violence there must be an effort made to put an end to the wrongful use of firearms in America. Moore did a great job of presenting a delicate subject to the American people and was deserving of the Academy Award for the project.

Please note that this sample paper on Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Are we a nation of guns? or are we just nuts? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Change

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Change. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Change paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Change, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Change paper at affordable prices!

Change may occur due to a number of reasons, and may also be described as a number of things such as a journey or a transformation. We see numerous changes in our society everyday, and our perspectives change as we broaden our horizons and open up to new things. We see a change in perspectives through texts such as the play of Cosi by Louis Nowra, The Dead Poet's Society Movie, by Peter Weir, the stimulus text Sky High, by Hannah Roberts, and the film The Sixth Sense. Many different types of changes occur throughout these texts, but the main change is through perspectives by individuals, and the journey they make through change to get to the arrival.

Cosi, by Louis Nowra, is a play, which examines the capacity of human beings to change, and it demonstrates the benefits of change in our society and as an individual. The play is based on many attitudes and viewpoints. The characters Lewis and Roy especially see a change and transformation. These characters change their perspectives on life and also their perspective of other individuals around them.

Lewis is a young, inspiring stage director who gets given the job of directing a play for people from a mental institution. Because of where the actors are from mental asylum, Lewis believes that directing a play with them is too hard, and is very doubtful about whether it will work. Lewis goes through change because the character Roy influences him. Roy is a patient who has many problems and self-doubts, but is excited about performing in a play.

As the play develops, Lewis gradually starts to transform and change into a character who is positive towards the play and is more than capable of directing a succeeding play. The other patients transform Lewis as he uses a mixture of laughter and madness to create success in the play. Lewis gradually starts to love the patients and love what he is doing.

Buy cheap Change term paper

Lewis realises that his girlfriend Lucy, is not the most important thing in his life, and they break up as Lucy believes that "working with these people has changed you". Lewis believes that life is more about the important things such as "love and fidelity".

In Act , there is a complete role reversal between the characters Roy and Lewis. At the beginning, Roy had a very optimistic view towards the play, as it had been his dream to perform in the play/opera "Cosi Fan Tutte". Throughout the play we discover more about Roy and his insecurities, and the changes he goes through on his perspective of life and on the play. He no longer wants to be in the play because he is jealous of Lewis and his success with it and believes he isn't as successful. "I'm not leaving, I'm quitting".

Changes occur in the play Cosi, and are shown through various techniques. One is by having a play-within-a-play. By dressing the characters up and letting them step into someone else's life, they start to forget about their problems and beliefs, and their character is brought out more. The changes, which occur in Cosi, go through a journey to discovery. The journey in this play is just as important as the arrival, if not more.

Sky High by Hannah Roberts, is a short story in which many changes occur. These changes are natural and gradual, from being young and innocent to being in the adult world. Hannah has undergone change physically through a journey of life. The "smooth, sweat-damp hands" have become hands "beginning to accumulate the line-etched story of life".

The clothesline of her adulthood is personified. It is "age warped" with "sagging wires" which is much like herself who has aged over a journey of years. The use of oscillation shows Hannah's journey from childhood to adulthood. Hanging washing, which she remembers as a child, seemed "like coloured flags in a secret code". The items on the line seemed mysterious, where as now as Hannah is older, they are explained as "semaphore secrets". Rationality and experience has supplanted inclination and the imagination.

"It is unlikely the washing line could support me this time". Hannah acknowledges that as an adult she too has many responsibilities, which are keeping her from participating in her childhood activities. With age and experience and as our life goes through a journey of time, our perspectives change. In Cosi, Lewis experiences the real world. This leads him to having a changed perspective on himself, his society and his values. This is also like in Sky High, Hannah starts to experience the real world as she goes on a journey through life and grows older, and realises that she is no longer a child anymore.

The Sixth Sense is another text in which there is a change in perspective through a journey of experiences. This change is mainly seen through Cole Sears, a young boy who can see dead people. Both Cole and his counsellor Malcolm go through many changed throughout the film. Cole Sear changes his perspective from being scared and running from his sixth sense, to realising that he can use it to help the dead people find closure and for the families of them to gain answers.

Dr Malcolm Crowe, Cole's counsellor, also goes through a change in perspective from someone who is living to someone who is dead. Cole helps Malcolm come to terms with this. His realisation helps him to sort out the problems with his wide and to say goodbye properly.

Lyn Sear, Cole's mother, also changes her perspective especially at the end when she finally understands her son and his perspective. Lyn is also able to have a change in perspective of her mother, after Cole passes on a message to her that allows closure and happiness.

Cole, who was once called a freak and was teased by the other children at school, turns into a hero, as he goes on a journey to change. "I'm ready to communicate with you now…tell you my secrets". Cole has changed his perspective and is now ready to tell his mother his problems and worries.

The use of loud music in the film, and close-up shots of people, shows us to the extent that Cole was scared. Flashbacks at the end of the film show the different perspectives of Cole and how they have changed.

The Dead Poet's Society is another text in which individuals go through a journey towards change.

Mr Keating, a new teacher at an upper class university, has a great influence on the other students. He is determined to teach with absolute passion and desire. Mr Keating changes the student's perspective of school from uninspiring and dull, to an inspiring place where they have a passion to learn. The boys ultimately find their souls as they go through a journey towards change by immersing themselves and finding their inner-self. The boys start to look at life from a different perspective and it allows them to see in a way in which others don't attempt to see.

Two characters in particular go through a journey to change in the film. One is Neil Perry. Neil has changed his perspective to see school and his dreams in a whole new way because of the confidence in which Mr Keating brought out in him. Neil's dream was to act, but his father prohibited it, which resulted in Neil committing suicide. "Don't wait until it's too late to realise your potential".

Another character, which goes through a journey towards change, is Todd Anderson. Mr Keating pushed him to think for himself and to use his mind to create a poem. Todd could not complete it alone because of his low self-confidence and fear of embarrassment, which kept him from showing his creativity. His creativity was then unleashed by Mr Keating's pursuance and Todd's perspective changed to being more confident. "Oh Captain, My Captain". Todd changes from being a quiet boy, to standing on his desk and shouting to Mr Keating calling him his captain. These changes all occur through a journey of self-discovery, through the influence of one man.

Perspectives are changed by a number of reasons. These include the influence in which individuals have on you, as well as the natural and gradual journey towards change. These changes are seen in texts such as The Dead Poet's Society, Cosi, Sky High, and The Sixth Sense. Many individuals in these texts go through a process or a journey towards positive changes, which creative a positive arrival.

These texts all demonstrate a better understanding of change through the nature and the effects is has on change.

Please note that this sample paper on Change is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Change, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Change will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!