If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on "Murder in Greenwich". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality "Murder in Greenwich" paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in "Murder in Greenwich", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your "Murder in Greenwich" paper at affordable prices!
Mark Fuhrman's book, "Murder in Greenwich," is a story about a murder that had been unsolved for twenty-seven years. In the book, Mark Fuhrman sets up the vivid crime scene to give the reader a good picture of exactly what happened on Halloween night 175 in Greenwich, Connecticut.
Martha was fairly new to Greenwich, but already she was very popular with her classmates, especially with the boys. There were two boys in particular Thomas and Michael Skakel. Thomas was 17, and Michael was 15 (Martha's age). These boys were two sons of Rushton Skakel, a very wealthy man who was related to the Kennedy's through his sister's (Ethel Skakel) marriage to Bobby Kennedy. On October 0, 175, Martha and a several of her friends decided to go out for what was supposed to be a night of harmless fun. After meeting up with Helen Ix and Geoffrey Byrne, they went to the Skakel's around nine. Michael Skakel, Martha, Helen, and Geoff sat in the Lincoln and listened to music for a while. Thomas Skakel came out of the house looking for a tape in the car. Instead of taking it and leaving, he got into the front seat with Martha and Michael and began to put the moves on Martha. Michael watched as his older, bigger brother put the moves on the girl that they were both interested in. Around 0, the party inside the house began to break up. Jim Terrien, a cousin of the Skakel's, had been there all evening and was ready to go home, so Rush Skakel, Jr., John Skakel, and Jim came out to tell everyone to get out of the car so that they could go to the Terrien's. Michael decided that he wanted to go, so he asked Martha to come with him. She refused and told him that she had to go home. Everyone left except for Thomas and Martha. Helen and Geoff reported that they saw Thomas and Martha flirting, roughhousing, and eventually kissing as they were leaving. That was the last time they would see their friend Martha.
At the Moxley house, Dorothy was upstairs painting when she heard unfriendly voices around 0 through a closed window and dogs barking loudly, so she went to look out the window but saw nothing. The next morning, Shelia McGuire found the body of Martha Moxley. She immediately ran to the Moxley home, where she told Jean Walker. Jean was a neighbor who was over trying to help Dorothy figure out where Martha was. At this time, the police were called.
It was apparent that Martha had been murdered using a golf club that was found to belong to the Skakel's. The Greenwich police had no clue how to handle a murder. The body was not watched carefully. Many people viewed and moved the body before a medical examiner even saw it. Others tampered with evidence. The whole thing was actually unorganized due to a lack of knowledge of how to handle a homicide. It had been years since Greenwich had to deal with such a thing. Fuhrman blames much of why the case was not solved on the incompetence of the police.
Help with essay on "Murder in Greenwich"
The Skakel family was very cooperative at first, until the cops began to focus in on Thomas Skakel as the main suspect. Fuhrman suggests in the book that it was not Thomas, but Michael who committed the murder. The only problem in determining this is how the Greenwich Police Department investigated the crime. The case became cold quickly and unsolved.
Mark Fuhrman, an investigator for many years in the LAPD, does show his skills and dedication as a detective as he writes this book. His concern for Martha Moxley and her family is evident. Fuhrman is given virtually no support by the Greenwich, Connecticut Police Department and others involved with the case refuse to talk to him, ostensibly because the case is still open. Fuhrman is persistently determined in his efforts to dig up information and shed some new light on this case, a case that by all rights should have been much more simple than it became.
Fuhrman places much of the blame on the Greenwich Police Department. This police force was comprised primarily of detectives that had never investigated a homicide before. Evidence was bungled from the start. The victims body was not properly handled, witnesses not properly interviewed, evidence carelessly collected and stored. The Skakel family, while initially cooperative, became less so as the focus narrowed in on one of their own.
Mark Fuhrman goes to great length to detail this investigation, but I find his writing to be a bit dry (despite his obvious enthusiasm for the subject matter). I also dislike the way he jumps back & forth between the various timelines in the case. Even so, the book does give a great understanding of the case. I had actually never heard anything about this murder until this book brought it to my attention. It was very insightful in helping me understand how cops can mess up an investigation and, therefore; it never gets solved.
Fuhrman is also quite clear in outlining how and why he comes to his conclusions. I did find, however, that this book read more like a textbook or crime manual than it did a true crime story. It was rather on the dry side and Fuhrman frequently restated his points, which I found annoying. This technique also made me feel as though I was re-reading entire paragraphs & pages of text, again annoying.
One nice aspect of the book is that Fuhrman does a good job of dispensing with police jargon - sometimes a problem when a former investigator writes a book. He also does not over simplify things. He pretty much assumes that someone reading this book will have a basic grasp of true crime & investigative procedures, and goes on from there.
Mark Fuhrman did quite a good job on the investigative angle, especially considering the difficulty he had finding relevant documents or someone willing to speak with him openly about the case. He does lead the reader to some startling new evidence and some new conclusions. In retrospect, seeing that a Grand Jury was convened & Michael Skakel was charged with murder (as a juvenile) following the publishing of the book, one can assume that Fuhrman was definitely headed in the right direction.
In conclusion, the book started off very intriguing. About midway through, it became very redundant and dry. Still, overall, I was impressed with Mark Fuhrman's detective skills. He was able to actually make a good, strong case naming Micheal Skakel as the murderer twenty-five years later; something that the Greenwich police couldn't even do right after the crime took place. It makes you wonder what the Greenwich Police Department was trying to cover up.
Works Cited
Fuhrman, Mark. Murder in Greenwich. HarperCollins. 1.
Works Cited
Fuhrman, Mark. Murder in Greenwich. HarperCollins. 1.
Please note that this sample paper on "Murder in Greenwich" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on "Murder in Greenwich", we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on "Murder in Greenwich" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
